Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1089 14
Original file (NR1089 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 8. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No:NRO1089-14
15 April 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: ———_
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments

(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 813/112
of 10 Apr 2014

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was
advanced to E-4/EN3 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement
examination.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and
George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice
on 14 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and

especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:

a. Petitioner was advanced to E-4/EN3 from the March 2012
Navy-wide advancement exam with an effective.;date of 16 Novémber
2012 with a Time In Rate date of 1 July 2013.

b. Petitioner converted to the Machinist Mate (MM) rating
on 20 March 2013 as a E-4/MM3.

Note: The change in the effective date of advancement to E-4
may also impact on Petitioner’s E-4 advancement opportunity. If
Petitioner was eligible for, but did not take an E-5 examination
because the above change had not yet been made, the following
procedures will apply to remediate that missed opportunity.
Petitioner should take the next available E-5 advancement
examination and compare the Final Multiple Score (FMS) received
on that examination with the FMS that was required for the
“missed” examination. If the score received meets or exceeds
the score that was previously required for advancement,
Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of
advancement to E-S retroactive to the date Petitioner would have
been advanced on the "missed” examination cycle. A DD Form 149,
a command endorsement/recommendation, and a copy of this letter
must be included with the request. The Board will determine
whether the request will be approved.

b. ‘That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6{c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Conic d Lovclegen or

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRONTE I. MONTGOMER
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on

behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

TS D, e—

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

15 April 2014

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0500 14

    Original file (NR0500 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she advanced to E-4/1T3 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. If the score received mects or exceeds the score that was previously required for advancement, Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of advancement to E-5 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have been advanced on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3376 14

    Original file (NR3376 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/085 of 13 Mar 2014 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/AT3 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0167 14

    Original file (NR0167 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/HM2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5654 14

    Original file (NR5654 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that petitioner wag advanced to E-4 from the February 2013 Navy-wide advancement 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zealman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2940 14

    Original file (NR2940 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/AT3 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR882 14

    Original file (NR882 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed | enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to B-4/¥YN3 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9678 14

    Original file (NR9678 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner advanced to E-6/AWOl from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Ms. Countryman, Mr. Bey, and Mr. Koman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on , 19 November 2014 and, pursuant to its reguiations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3535 14

    Original file (NR3535 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/AWF1 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination due to two missing award points. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8230 14

    Original file (NR8230 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant te the provisions of reference {a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to shew that Petitionsr advanced to E-4/AWS3 via the Advanced Technical Field program. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0322 14

    Original file (NR0322 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/ETl from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...